2026 NBA draft big board rankings: Top 100 prospects

As the NBA draft approaches, my final update to the 2026 draft rankings comes with a major change at the top: Darryn Peterson reclaims the No. 1 spot, with AJ Dybantsa dropping back to No. 2.

Peterson began the season ranked No. 1 on my board and as the soft favorite around the league to hear his name called first. I saw him make six 3s and score 24 points in a half in an exhibition against Louisville in October that only reaffirmed that stance. In an league where elite shot creation and 3-point shooting are critical for playoff success, Peterson felt like the biggest swing and most NBA-ready star talent.

Then, at Kansas, the discourse got loud around him at a time when there was minimal knowledge about why he checked out of games early. On Jan. 31, Peterson’s Kansas team and Dybantsa’s BYU team went head-to-head at Allen Fieldhouse and Peterson mustered the best half of basketball I saw from any player all season. He scored 18 points in 20 minutes before leaving the game.

Dybantsa still was my No. 1 in February, a tough decision that reflected a general shift in attitude around the NBA at that point. Dybantsa answered the call with strong play in February and March, while Peterson finished out the season visibly at less than 100%. The margin between the two remained razor-thin and needed to play out, however.

Ultimately, one of the hardest pieces of player evaluation is being able to laser in on a player’s talent and try to separate it from negative context. The more I’ve learned from various league sources about Peterson — most importantly, hearing about NBA teams’ current comfort level with his medicals — the more comfortable I feel viewing his season as a one-off. I’m focusing on his special traits that point to stardom and are worth whatever the perceived risk might be.

This decision is less about Dybantsa’s own talents. And with much lesser stakes, it mirrors the choice the Washington Wizards are mulling over in the coming days.

Here are ESPN’s final rankings for the 2026 draft class. This process is informed by my own player evaluation and intel from around the NBA and college ranks, and it offers a representation of the available player pool and insight into executives’ and scouts’ views. (The draft starts Tuesday on ESPN, ABC and the ESPN App.)

Quick links:
Latest mock draft | More draft coverage

Freshman | Height: 6-6 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 2

Strengths: Peterson is the most gifted scorer in this draft. He is a remarkable long-range shotmaker capable of prolonged hot streaks and able to take over a game while playing in flow. He’s a strong athlete with good size for a ball handler, his likely long-term role. He’s also a willing defender with active hands who can apply pressure on the perimeter.

Weaknesses: Peterson played on the ball plenty in high school, but he wasn’t able to show much of that at Kansas due to personnel, style of play, and the impact of a challenging health situation. Sharpening his handle and getting more playmaking reps will be key to realizing his ceiling, a piece of his development that stalled due to circumstances in college.

The verdict: After entering the fall projected at No. 1, Peterson struggled to stay healthy and played through a strange season after a battle with cramping. However, NBA teams haven’t appeared concerned with his long-term health. His best moments, while further between than he and Kansas hoped, underscored why NBA teams still view him as a future star who executives liken stylistically to Devin Booker. Peterson can be one of the best guards in the league, and after gaining a better understanding of the context, he reclaims the top spot on my board.

play

Shams Charania: Darryn Peterson working out only with Wizards

Freshman | Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 1

Strengths: Dybantsa has elite positional size, strength and movement skills, and he thrives attacking downhill and in the midrange. He excels at drawing fouls and playing through contact. He grew into a more mature, decisive player between November and March, and showed growth in getting teammates involved as a passer.

Weaknesses: At this stage, he doesn’t impact the game much without the ball in his hands. Dybantsa is inconsistent shooting from long range and will have to keep defenses honest to hit his ceiling as a player. Continuing to sharpen his handle to make it even harder to keep him out of the paint, will help. He has the capacity and physicality to be a great defender, but didn’t create many turnovers at BYU and needs to better apply himself on that end.

The verdict: Viewed as a potential No. 1 pick since his freshman year of high school, Dybantsa managed to exceed expectations at BYU, leading D-I in scoring while shooting 51% and improving as the season went along. He reminded NBA teams of just how special his offensive tool kit is, with his trajectory comparing favorably to star wings including Kawhi Leonard and Jaylen Brown. He looks the part as a franchise player, but he will have to continue expanding his game on both ends to get there.

play

Dybantsa on why he should go No. 1: ‘I’m exciting and I fill seats’

Freshman | Height: 6-9 | Age: 18.9 | Previous ranking: 3

Strengths: Boozer dominates games not only with great strength and skill, but also with an extremely quick basketball mind. He’s become very comfortable on the perimeter, handling and distributing the ball and shooting from range. He’s an excellent decision-maker and passer who makes others better. He’s also a smart, tough positional defender.

Weaknesses: Though it hasn’t held him back from success at every step of his career thus far, Boozer is an average run-jump athlete. His lack of vertical explosiveness limits the ways he can score against length and create for himself off the bounce. He’s not a great shot blocker and can struggle to cover ground when forced to defend multiple actions.

The verdict: Boozer has a real case at No. 1 that is bolstered by NBA analytics models that value his remarkable all-around production. He should be an immediate winning starter in the league, with room to grow. Due to his lack of foot speed and verticality, there are certain athletic plays he doesn’t make, raising the question of whether he can be the leading man on a championship-level team or if he’s better cast as a secondary star. Regardless, he should be an excellent player, with scouts comparing him (perhaps conservatively) to players like Kevin Love, Al Horford and Domantas Sabonis.

play

Cameron Boozer’s NBA draft profile

Freshman | Height: 6-10 | Age: 19.9 | Previous ranking: 4

Strengths: Wilson’s energy and explosiveness help him play above the rim and win battles on the interior. He plays hard, dunks everything and has untapped offensive upside if he can improve his ball skills and jumper. He proved to be able to impact high-level college games in spite of that, putting his fingerprints on nearly every game in which he played.

Weaknesses: Wilson isn’t the most gifted ball handler or perimeter shooter and is a ways from realizing his top-end offensive ceiling. He needs to apply his tools more consistently on defense from a positioning and awareness standpoint, with some of his value on that end still theoretical.

The verdict: Athletic frontcourt players who compete the way Wilson does are always in high demand. He’s exceptionally quick off the floor and should contribute in several areas other than scoring. His skill development is still a work in progress, however. The midrange touch and passing instincts he has shown point to his underlying talent. Although injuries ended his season early, his transition to college was impressively smooth. He has excellent potential to tap into long-term, with his competitiveness inspiring confidence that he’ll reach it.

Freshman | Height: 6-6 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 5

Strengths: Wagler plays with pace and poise beyond his years, relying on his craft and playmaking vision to create shots for himself and teammates. He’s also a consistent shooter with great size, making him effective at either guard spot. His ability to process the floor and make great decisions made Illinois an elite offensive team, and he flashed his potential to become a lead facilitator.

Weaknesses: Wagler has average length and needs to add physical strength to realize his full capabilities on both ends of the ball, something he has time to address. He has questions to answer defensively and is not explosive or fast by NBA standards, which could make for a steep adjustment and add some risk to his profile.

The verdict: A late-blooming prospect who was not nationally ranked out of high school, Wagler emerged as a college star. His developing offensive game is on a clear growth trajectory. After leading a surprise Final Four run, he set himself apart among the elite guards in the class. NBA teams have also factored in his outstanding intangibles, viewing him as a building-block guard with stellar upside.

Freshman | Height: 6-3 | Age: 19.6 | Previous ranking: 6

Strengths: Acuff Jr. is dynamic and strong with the ball in his hands, adept at attacking his spots off the bounce and scoring at all three levels. While his 44% 3-point clip may not sustain, he showed improvement as a shooter. He took a notable step forward as a decision-maker at Arkansas, limiting turnovers, getting teammates involved, and proving he could drive winning basketball.

Weaknesses: Acuff Jr. is a lackluster defender due to a mix of suboptimal height and inconsistent effort. As good as he could be offensively, building a championship-level defense behind him will pose a challenge at the next level.

The verdict: Acuff Jr. exceeded expectations in college and proved to be much closer to NBA-ready than most scouts initially expected. He’s going to need the ball in his hands a lot, and his defensive shortcomings have made him polarizing for some evaluators. His ability to create for himself and others offers long-term star power if he continues on his current trajectory.

Freshman | Height: 6-5 | Age: 20.2 | Previous ranking: 7

Strengths: Brown has a well-rounded offensive tool kit for a lead guard, with good size and vision in transition and the half court. His dynamic shotmaking ability from long range also points to major scoring potential as he matures.

Weaknesses: Brown tends to settle for tough shots and has to diversify his tendencies better in the pros. He has room to better apply his size and play more physically on both ends of the floor, in attacking the paint and embracing defensive matchups, where he tends to be below-average.

The verdict: Although a back injury contributed to his up-and-down season at Louisville, Brown has obvious long-term upside that has kept him front of mind as a lottery prospect. His strong history with USA Basketball has helped strengthen his résumé with teams. While his freshman season didn’t go the way he wanted, he has the time and obvious talent to unlock his ability in the NBA.

play

Mikel Brown Jr.’s NBA draft profile

Freshman | Height: 6-4 | Age: 19.5 | Previous ranking: 8

Strengths: Flemings is the best all-around athlete among the first-round guards. He is explosive downhill, is an unselfish floor leader, and is also a willing defender. His quickness getting into the teeth of the defense helps compensate for his slight frame and average length.

Weaknesses: Jump shooting was viewed as Flemings’ primary weakness entering college. He displayed real growth in that area, despite unorthodox mechanics. He will need to improve as a finisher through contact and gain strength to play his preferred style in the pros.

The verdict: Flemings’ athleticism, playmaking and competitive intangibles separated him as a freshman, as he instantly became the top player at Houston and nearly took them back to the Final Four. He projects as a quality long-term NBA player, with his ceiling tied to continued improvement as a perimeter shooter.

Freshman | Height: 6-10 | Age: 19.5 | Previous ranking: 9

Strengths: Ament has a tantalizing mix of size, fluidity, perimeter skill and shot-making potential, fitting a coveted forward archetype that is difficult to find in any draft. He has room to gain strength as his body matures, and should develop into a better jump shooter than he showed in college.

Weaknesses: He was inefficient scoring the ball at Tennessee, making just 43% of 2-point attempts and particularly struggled as a finisher. His below-average speed and explosiveness could limit how much offense he’ll provide in the NBA. He’s also a little stiff defensively for his size.

The verdict: Ament began the season as a projected top-five pick, but became polarizing for evaluators due to his inconsistent play and struggles to create easy looks for himself. Landing with a team that can afford him immediate minutes and developmental attention will be critical. Players with his caliber of size and upside tend to receive long runways.

Junior | Height: 7-3 | Age: 21.2 | Previous ranking: 10

Strengths: Mara is unusually skilled — and unusually tall. He has good touch around the rim and is an outstanding passer and quick processor who excels playing out of two-man actions. While not the most mobile defender, his size makes him a quality defensive deterrent around the basket.

Weaknesses: Mara has made strides with his conditioning, but he isn’t particularly mobile or quick off the floor. He sometimes struggles to rebound out of his area and isn’t defensively versatile. He’s a developing but unreliable jump shooter.

The verdict: Transferring to Michigan rejuvenated Mara’s prospect status after two down seasons at UCLA. He’s the most offensively gifted center in this draft, with NBA teams intrigued by his ability to play as a hub and help facilitate quality offense. His rare skill level offers fascinating upside in a league that has trended back toward teams deploying true centers.

Freshman | Height: 6-4 | Age: 20.7 | Previous ranking: 11

Strengths: Burries is a well-rounded combo guard and solid shooter who plays both ends of the floor and rebounds his position well. He can create for himself and teammates in a range of secondary actions. His multiple strengths give him several pathways to NBA success.

Weaknesses: Burries is the oldest freshman in this draft and an average athlete for his position. He’s not a naturally gifted point guard and is undersized for a wing. His appeal centers more on his immediate well-rounded game than high-end projection.

The verdict: Burries rebounded from a tough start at Arizona and emerged as the top scorer on a 36-3 team while establishing himself as a consensus lottery pick. He is a jack-of-all-trades and plays with a winning mentality. He should have no issues slotting into an NBA rotation, even if he lacks the obvious upside of some of his peers.

play

Brayden Burries’ NBA draft profile

Senior | Height: 6-9 | Age: 23.7 | Previous ranking: 12

Strengths: Lendeborg’s versatility sets him apart. He has center-sized dimensions and can handle, pass and shoot, play in transition and defend all over the floor.

Weaknesses: He will turn 24 later this year, making him exceptionally old for a rookie. He can be inconsistent with his motor and sometimes struggles with physical interior play against opponents of his size.

The verdict: Lendeborg, the centerpiece of Michigan’s 37-3 title team, is one of the draft’s most unique cases: His skill set is coveted by every NBA team, but he also finished high school in 2020, the same year as established NBA stars such as Cade Cunningham and Scottie Barnes. Lendeborg has all the requisite ability to make an NBA impact, but history shows that 23-year-old draftees tend to top out quickly as role players. He will appeal most to playoff teams that are ready to compete.

Freshman | Height: 6-11 | Age: 20.1 | Previous ranking: 15

Strengths: Steinbach is arguably the top rebounder in this draft, as he led the country with 11.8 boards per game last season. He’s productive, physical, has good touch and hands around the basket and competes defensively. His dependability is a strong sell for NBA teams.

Weaknesses: Steinbach is not a traditional rim protector, nor is he defensively versatile, so he might need to be optimized alongside a more agile, shot-blocking big man. He’s developing his jumper, but most of his scoring comes inside the paint.

The verdict: Despite playing on a poor team at Washington, Steinbach was a consistent producer and backed up what he’d shown NBA scouts playing for Germany’s youth teams. He has limitations defensively, but he remains a safe bet to carve out an NBA career, particularly if he starts to shoot the 3 with confidence.

14. Karim Lopez, SF/PF, New Zealand Breakers

Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.2 | Previous ranking: 13

Strengths: Lopez is a perimeter-oriented forward with good feel who competes on both ends. He’s tough, physical and active, which allowed him to impact games against much older pros in Australia in a significant role for the New Zealand Breakers. His profile is well-rounded for a player his age, but he lacks an elite calling-card skill.

Weaknesses: Perimeter shooting and ballhandling are key improvement areas for Lopez to have a path to creating his own offense. He is a solid but not elite athlete for his position.

The verdict: NBA teams expect Lopez, who spent the past two years in the NBL, to be the first international prospect off the board. His game is unflashy and divisive for some scouts, but he offers versatility and strong intangibles as a player who can help mesh lineups. He has developmental upside long-term at the four, if his shooting and ball skills come along.

Sophomore | Height: 6-9 | Age: 20.4 | Previous ranking: 14

Strengths: Johnson is a tough big man with length and the agility to switch onto the perimeter on defense. He’s a great athlete who runs the floor well and can finish plays around the rim. He cemented himself as a winning player with his effort and consistency.

Weaknesses: Johnson’s offensive value is largely limited to finishing plays, and he’s still developing a shot from 3-point range. He is also undersized for a center.

The verdict: Johnson helped his stock tremendously during Michigan’s championship run, establishing himself as a bona fide first-rounder, showing growth as an all-around player and providing a defensive backbone for the Wolverines. While his scoring upside is limited, he has an NBA-ready frame, knows his strengths and should provide useful minutes as a rookie.

Sophomore | Height: 6-3 | Age: 20.2 | Previous ranking: 18

Strengths: An outstanding 3-point shooter and savvy pick-and-roll navigator, Anderson is polished offensively, capable of managing the game and making defenses pay from long range. He’s comfortable with and without the ball, and he makes the most of his size on defense.

Weaknesses: Anderson is small for an NBA guard and isn’t explosive getting downhill, limiting his ability to live in the paint. His below-average physical profile will require continued skill growth as a finisher to compensate and shoulder a starter-level offensive workload.

The verdict: Anderson proved he could be efficient with major usage in an expanded role for Texas Tech last season. His feel for playmaking as well as his efficient scoring profile will give him a pathway into an NBA rotation. He has intriguing long-term upside for an NBA team willing to look past his size.

Freshman | Height: 6-9 | Age: 19.9 | Previous ranking: 17

Strengths: Graves’ college production has popped heavily in NBA analytics models, due to his well-rounded play in a connective supporting role at Santa Clara. He’s a smart passer who is comfortable on the perimeter and made 41% of his 3s last season. He has good defensive awareness that helps compensate for his lack of quickness.

Weaknesses: He lacks ideal foot speed and explosiveness for an NBA player, which limits how he can create his own shot and muddies his projection on defense. He’s a capable but somewhat mechanical outside shooter at this stage.

The verdict: The dissonance between Graves’ exciting analytics projection and occasionally underwhelming eye test makes him an interesting prospect. He’s a winning player with the capability to play a useful role, but questions linger as to how parts of his game will translate against much better competition. The numbers suggest his positive traits will outweigh the negative.

Sophomore | Height: 6-4 | Age: 20.6 | Previous ranking: 16

Strengths: Philon has an excellent handle, which allows him to change speeds and comfortably create his own shot. He’s a threat to score from long range and can generate instant offense. While not a top-flight passer, he showed improvement as a playmaker this season.

Weaknesses: Philon has a slight build and is an average athlete by NBA standards. He is a capable but not elite passer and an inconsistent defender. He might profile better as a rotational backcourt scorer than as a starting point guard in a winning context.

The verdict: Philon made a good decision to return to Alabama a year ago, showing improvement across the board this season while stepping into a larger role. His pace, knack for scoring and punishing screen coverages give him a pathway to NBA success, particularly if he can take his passing to another level.

play

Labaron Philon’s NBA draft profile

Freshman | Height: 6-11 | Age: 19.4 | Previous ranking: 21

Strengths: Cenac has excellent length, moves fluidly for his size and has made strides as a rebounder. He has also flashed natural shooting touch, giving him an intriguing base for an NBA team to develop. At his age, bigs with this physical profile don’t come around in every draft.

Weaknesses: The idea of Cenac was often more intriguing than his actual output. He hasn’t been an efficient scorer and is still learning the game. He also didn’t block many shots in college, although that was partially due to his role at Houston, where he was asked to focus on rebounding.

The verdict: Cenac is a project still forming his on-court identity, but he benefited from his year playing for a physical, demanding program at Houston. As a mobile big with the potential to space the floor and protect the rim, he could eventually fit an extremely valuable NBA archetype for a team willing to be patient.

Senior | Height: 6-4 | Age: 22.7 | Previous ranking: 19

Strengths: Stirtz is one of the draft’s better shooters and a polished ball-screen operator. Those skills translated successfully as he ascended the college ladder, from D-II Northwest Missouri State to Drake to Iowa. He should be able to impact the game offensively right away.

Weaknesses: He lacks optimal burst and strength for an NBA ball handler, sometimes struggling to get clean separation off the dribble. There are also concerns about how his lack of athleticism will translate defensively. Iowa played a very slow tempo, and he will have to adjust to the faster pace of the NBA.

The verdict: Stirtz, on the short list of best guards in college basketball last season, carried a massive workload for Iowa, proving to be a capable and efficient offensive engine. He’s on the older side for a first-round pick (22), but it’s easy to see his shooting and playmaking scaling down into a useful pro role right away — provided he holds up on defense.

Sophomore | Height: 6-5 | Age: 21.6 | Previous ranking: 20

Strengths: Carr is a talented scorer and shotmaker with deep 3-point range. He’s one of the draft’s most explosive athletes and can play above the rim and finish. He’s a good shot-blocker for a wing and has room to become a solid team defender.

Weaknesses: Carr is still a streaky shooter who often relies on tough looks. He also isn’t much of a ball handler or playmaker for teammates, likely confining him to an off-ball role. His defensive impact was inconsistent in college.

The verdict: After spending two seasons mired on the bench at Tennessee, Carr broke out upon transferring to Baylor, showing NBA-caliber scoring upside, albeit on a middling team. Becoming a more consistent all-around performer and tougher defender will be key as he transitions likely into lower-usage role.

Sophomore | Height: 6-10 | Age: 18.9 | Previous ranking: 22

Strengths: Quaintance is a powerful athlete with excellent length and great defensive upside. He has the tools to excel as a play-finisher and rim-runner, capable of playing above the rim and bullying weaker bigs.

Weaknesses: Quaintance doesn’t shoot from range or offer much skill upside on the offensive end. He’s undersized for a center, though he has great length. There are concerns about the health of his knee as he continues to work his way back from a February 2025 ACL injury.

The verdict: If Quaintance can return to full health, he has all the talent to succeed as a rotational center, with physical ability that outweighs the other warts in his game. It remains to be seen how his knee injury will impact his place on draft boards, but he’s an obvious first-round talent if he gets back on track physically.

Junior | Height: 6-8 | Age: 20.9 | Previous ranking: 23

Strengths: Swain is a downhill scorer and straight-line driver with NBA proportions and playmaking instincts. He has good physical tools to defend the perimeter and rebounds well for his position.

Weaknesses: Swain’s primary swing skill is 3-point shooting, but he struggles with his confidence from long range at times. He’s not the most polished offensive player and has to improve without the ball in his hands.

The verdict: Swain looks the part as a two-way NBA wing, but he is still a bit of a rough sketch. He showed improved assertiveness after transferring to Texas last season and showed he can handle more offensive responsibility. Continuing to improve his shooting will be critical for his chances of finding a niche.

Freshman | Height: 6-2 | Age: 19.2 | Previous ranking: 27

Strengths: Okorie is an elusive guard who plays low to the ground, changes pace effectively and has a good feel for getting to his spots. Although he’s on the smaller side, he can be disruptive defensively.

Weaknesses: He’s small and slight for a lead guard, and there are questions around what level of passer he will be in the NBA. While comfortable shooting from deep, he can be streaky on 3s.

The verdict: Okorie was a surprise one-and-done player, riding the wave of a strong freshman season into the draft. While his skill set may project more easily as a second-unit playmaker, the shot creation he showed as an 18-year-old freshman was no less impressive. He showed a considerable knack for scoring and vaulted himself into the first-round picture.

Sophomore | Height: 6-6 | Age: 20.5 | Previous ranking: 24

Strengths: Evans hangs his hat on his long-range shooting — he averaged seven 3s per game at Duke this season — and is capable of hitting tough looks off balance from deep. He has good size and length for a wing shooter, and room to grow defensively.

Weaknesses: Consistency has been a challenge for Evans at times, though he took a step in the right direction this season. He’s not explosive or quick and doesn’t create much off the bounce, which could put him in a box offensively as more of a perimeter specialist.

The verdict: Evans took an all-around step forward this season at Duke, and can hang his hat on his shotmaking as he continues to develop. It may take a little more time for him to become a winning contributor in the NBA, but shooters of his caliber and size are often in demand.

Remaining big board for the 2026 class

26. Zuby Ejiofor, PF/C, St. John’s | Age: 22.2
27. Koa Peat, PF/SF, Arizona | Age: 19.4
28. Henri Veesaar, C, North Carolina | Age: 22.2
29. Meleek Thomas, SG/PG, Arkansas | Age: 19.9
30. Sergio de Larrea, PG/SG, Valencia | Age: 20.5
31. Alex Karaban, SF/PF, UConn | Age: 23.6
32. Tarris Reed Jr., C, UConn | Age: 22.9
33. Joshua Jefferson, SF/PF, Iowa State | Age: 22.6
34. Baba Miller, PF/C, Cincinnati | Age: 22.4
35. Ryan Conwell, SG, Louisville | Age: 22.0
36. Jack Kayil, PG/SG, Alba Berlin | Age: 20.4
37. Richie Saunders, SG/SF, BYU | Age: 24.7
38. Emanuel Sharp, SG, Houston | Age: 22.3
39. Braden Smith, PG, Purdue | Age: 22.9
40. Dillon Mitchell, PF, St. John’s | Age: 22.7
41. Trevon Brazile, PF/C, Arkansas | Age: 23.4
42. Felix Okpara, C, Tennessee | Age: 22.2
43. Ja’Kobi Gillespie, PG, Tennessee | Age: 22.3
44. Jaden Bradley , PG, Arizona | Age: 22.8
45. Izaiyah Nelson, PF/C, South Florida | Age: 22.7
46. Bryce Hopkins, SF/PF, St. John’s | Age: 23.8
47. Tobe Awaka, PF, Arizona | Age: 22.4
48. Ugonna Onyenso, C, Virginia | Age: 22.1
49. Bruce Thornton, PG, Ohio State | Age: 22.8
50. Tyler Nickel, SG, Vanderbilt | Age: 22.8
51. Tobi Lawal, PF, Virginia Tech | Age: 23.1
52. Aaron Nkrumah, SG, Tennessee State | Age: 24.3
53. Nick Martinelli, SF/PF, Northwestern | Age: 22.2
54. Vsevolod Ishchenko, SG/SF, Lokomotiv Kuban | Age: 21.3
55. Nate Bittle, C, Oregon | Age: 23.0
56. Maliq Brown, PF/C, Duke | Age: 22.6
57. Milos Uzan, PG, Houston | Age: 23.5
58. Noam Yaacov, PG, Oostende | Age: 21.7
59. Oscar Cluff, C, Purdue | Age: 24.6
60. Otega Oweh, SG/SF, Kentucky | Age: 23.0
61. Kylan Boswell, PG/SG, Illinois | Age: 21.2
62. Tyler Bilodeau, PF, UCLA | Age: 22.2
63. Michael Ajayi, SF, Butler | Age: 23.0
64. Jaden Henley, SG, Grand Canyon | Age: 22.2
65. Nick Boyd, PG/SG, Wisconsin | Age: 25.2
66. Malique Lewis, SF, Southeast Melbourne | Age: 21.6
67. Quadir Copeland, PG, NC State | Age: 22.8
68. Rafael Castro , C, George Washington | Age: 23.2
69. Graham Ike, PF, Gonzaga | Age: 23.9
70. Jaron Pierre Jr., SG, SMU | Age: 23.9
71. Tre Donaldson, PG, Miami | Age: 22.5
72. Ernest Udeh Jr., C, Miami | Age: 22.4
73. Mark Mitchell, PF, Missouri | Age: 22.8
74. Tamin Lipsey, PG, Iowa State | Age: 23.0
75. Keyshawn Hall, SF, Auburn | Age: 23.2
76. Darrion Williams, SF, NC State | Age: 23.2
77. Trey Kaufman-Renn, PF/C, Purdue | Age: 23.8
78. Seth Trimble, PG/SG, North Carolina | Age: 21.9
79. Elijah Mahi, SG, Santa Clara | Age: 22.7
80. Lamar Wilkerson, SG, Indiana | Age: 24.6
81. Peter Suder, PG/SG, Miami (Ohio) | Age: 22.9
82. Duke Miles, PG/SG, Vanderbilt | Age: 24.4
83. William Kyle III, PF, Syracuse | Age: 22.3
84. Tre Carroll, SF, Xavier | Age: 23.2
85. Isaac McKneely, SG, Louisville | Age: 22.6
86. Malik Reneau, PF, Miami | Age: 23.2
87. Jalen Washington, PF/C, Vanderbilt | Age: 22.3
88. Lajae Jones, SG/SF, Florida State | Age: 22.1
89. Tucker DeVries, SG/SF, Indiana | Age: 23.5
90. Robert McCray V, PG, Florida State | Age: 23.7
91. Jaxon Kohler, C, Michigan State | Age: 23.0
92. Cade Tyson, SG/SF, Minnesota | Age: 22.9
93. Jaylin Sellers, SG, Providence | Age: 23.0
94. Donovan Atwell, SG, Texas Tech | Age: 22.8
95. Josh Dix, SG, Creighton | Age: 22.0
96. Melvin Council Jr., PG/SG, Kansas | Age: 24.2
97. Mohammad Amini, G/F, Nancy | Age: 21.1
98. Malik Dia, SF/PF, Ole Miss | Age: 22.4
99. Fletcher Loyer, SG, Purdue | Age: 22.8
100. Ben Humrichous, PF, Illinois | Age: 23.9